Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment
In which scenario would a case manager NOT need to proceed with ongoing involvement?
When there is a high risk of future maltreatment
When present danger is identified
When family refuses all services
When community resources are available
The correct answer is: When family refuses all services
When a family refuses all services, it may not be necessary for the case manager to continue ongoing involvement, particularly if there are no immediate safety concerns or risks that would necessitate further intervention. In such cases, respect for family autonomy comes into play, acknowledging their right to refuse services while also recognizing that the case manager's role is to provide support and resources rather than to force intervention. If the family is not in a state of crisis and is able to maintain a safe environment without assistance, it may be appropriate for the case manager to step back. This situation is distinct from scenarios involving high risk of future maltreatment or present danger, where ongoing involvement would be crucial to ensure the safety and well-being of the child. Similarly, community resources being available does not negate the need for continued involvement if the family is at risk or in danger; those resources may need to be utilized effectively to protect the family. Thus, the context of family refusal allows for a decision to cease ongoing involvement, particularly when it aligns with the principles of family engagement and voluntary service provision.